There is a bakery two streets over from my sister’s house that used to send an email every Friday morning. For years the woman who owns it wrote them herself. She would tell you the lemon cake had not worked out that week. She would tell you her son had strep and the shop opened an hour late on Tuesday and she was sorry. She would mention there was a tray of slightly overbaked morning buns going for a dollar if anybody wanted them, and somebody always did.
I looked forward to that email the way you look forward to hearing from a friend who is terrible at texting but writes a beautiful letter.
Sometime this past spring the emails changed. The new ones are clean. They have headings and a nice typeface. They say things like “Discover our seasonal offerings” and “We’re excited to share what’s new in store this week.” There is nothing wrong with them, exactly. They are the email equivalent of a hotel lobby.
I stopped opening them in about three weeks, and I have been thinking ever since about why that bothered me so much more than it should have.
What copywriting actually was
The word makes people picture billboards and jingles, which is a shame, because for most of its history copywriting was something much quieter than that. It was the craft of writing to one person as if you knew her.
The best people who ever did this job had a rule they repeated to anyone who would listen: picture one reader, one specific human being, and write the whole thing to her. Not to an audience. Not to a demographic. To your neighbor, your aunt, the woman ahead of you in the pickup line who mentioned she has been looking for a good piano teacher.
That is the entire secret, and it is why the bakery emails worked. The owner was not writing to her list. She was writing to the forty or so people she actually knew by name, and the other six hundred of us got to read over their shoulders and feel like we had been let in.
It is also why the new emails do not work. You cannot read over anyone’s shoulder, because there is no one on the other end.
How we lost it
It did not happen all at once, and it did not happen because anybody meant it to.
First came the long stretch where every small business was told that what mattered was being findable. Put the words people search for into the page. Put them in a lot. Write more pages, write them faster, it does not have to be good, it has to exist. A whole industry grew up around producing text whose only real job was to be counted, and an awful lot of small business owners were quietly taught that writing was a chore to get through rather than the place where they might actually say something.
Then came the part everyone knows about. In the last few years it became possible to generate a year of that text in an afternoon, and a great many people did exactly that. The volume went up. The floor fell out.
I want to be fair here, because I use these tools too and most of the mothers I know who run something small do as well. There is nothing shameful about asking a machine to help you draft the shipping policy page. The trouble is what happened when the easy thing started getting used for the parts that were never supposed to be easy. The welcome note. The story of why you started. The Friday email.
Why this is changing
Two things happened in August of last year that I think will matter more than they seemed to at the time.
Google rolled out a spam update on the eighteenth, aimed at pages mass-produced to rank rather than written to be read. Whole sites that had been publishing on an industrial schedule simply stopped appearing. Google’s own position, which it has held for a while, is that it does not care whether a person or a machine produced something. It cares whether the thing was made for a reader or made for a search engine. The update was that position with teeth.
The second thing was quieter. Anthropic announced in August 2026 that it would add an invisible watermark to text generated by Claude, applied across its products, as Forbes reported on the eleventh. Close to two hundred companies have now signed onto the European code of practice on transparency for AI-generated content. None of this is airtight, and anyone promising you a perfect detector is selling something. But the assumption that generated text is anonymous, which held for about three years, is mostly broken now.
What I take from both is less technical than it sounds. The thing that was cheap and invisible is becoming neither.
The part nobody can generate
A machine can write you a paragraph about a lemon cake. It cannot tell you that this particular lemon cake did not work out, because it was not there on Thursday when the curd split.
It cannot tell you that the shop opened late because a seven year old spiked a fever at four in the morning. It does not know the thing you learned in your eleventh year of doing this that you have never heard anyone else say out loud. It does not know which question every single customer asks you before they buy, or the look on their face when you answer it.
That is not writing ability. That is just having lived through something, and it turns out to be the one input that cannot be synthesized. Everything that makes a piece of writing feel like it came from somewhere comes out of that.
Which is why I think this is a strange and genuinely good moment for the women I know who run small things out of their kitchens and spare rooms and garages. For twenty years they have been told that they could not compete with the people who could afford to publish more. That has quietly stopped being true. Volume is no longer the advantage. Having actually done the work is.
“Copywriting is making a huge comeback, and it is one of the most powerful tools small and mid-sized businesses should be leaning into right now, in the age of AI slop,” said Sean Donato of Easy Breeze, a marketing agency focused on copywriting for small businesses.
“A machine can write you ‘family owned since 1998.’ It cannot tell you what happened in 2011 that made you change the way you do estimates,” he said.
If you want to sound like yourself again
A few things that have helped the people I have watched try this.
Write to one person and use her name while you draft. Take it out later. The sentences change shape when there is somebody on the other end.
Say the specific thing. Not “quality ingredients.” The butter from the dairy on Route 9 that you drive out to get yourself because the delivery one tastes different. Specificity is the whole game and it costs nothing.
Tell on yourself a little. The lemon cake that failed. The order you got wrong in 2019 and how you fixed it. Nobody trusts a business that has never had a bad Tuesday.
Read it out loud. If you would not say it standing in your own shop, cut it. “We’re excited to share” is not a thing a human being has ever said aloud.
Cut your first paragraph. Almost always it is throat-clearing. The real opening is sitting there in paragraph two.
Put it down for a day. The best editor any of us has is tomorrow morning.
The bakery
I drove past the bakery last month and the owner was out front with a chalkboard, writing the day’s list by hand in her slightly slanted handwriting. Sticky toffee, sold out by ten. Sourdough, two loaves left. Morning buns, “a bit dark, a bit cheap.”
Everyone walking past slowed down to read it. Not one of them slowed down for the email.
She has not lost the ability. It is right there on the sidewalk in chalk. Somewhere along the way she got convinced that the version of her that belongs on a screen has to be smoother and more professional and less like a woman who has been up since four, and the opposite is true. The chalkboard is just wholesome good ole’ fashioned writing.
If you run something small, and you have been quietly worried that you cannot keep up with everyone publishing more than you, I would gently suggest that the race you were losing is a race that just ended. What is left is the thing you were always better at anyway.
Write the Friday email yourself. Mention the lemon cake.
Leave A Comment