Injectable aesthetic treatments have evolved to address a wide range of skin concerns, from hydration loss and dullness to structural aging and volume depletion. Two of the most frequently used techniques—biorevitalization and dermal fillers—offer distinct benefits depending on individual goals. Understanding their mechanisms and applications can help guide the choice of treatment for both patients and practitioners.

What Is Biorevitalization and How Does It Work

Biorevitalization is a treatment designed to restore skin vitality through deep hydration and regeneration. It typically involves multiple microinjections of hyaluronic acid or similar compounds into the dermis. These injections improve hydration, stimulate fibroblast activity, and enhance collagen and elastin production.

Unlike fillers, biorevitalization does not aim to change facial structure or volume. Instead, it works on skin texture, elasticity, and radiance. Patients often notice improvements in smoothness, firmness, and overall rejuvenation after a series of sessions spaced over several weeks.

What Dermal Fillers Are Designed to Do

Fillers, on the other hand, are injectable gels—often hyaluronic acid-based—formulated to augment volume, contour facial features, and fill wrinkles. Their primary role is structural: to support or reshape areas affected by tissue loss or aging.

These injections are typically placed deeper into the dermis or subcutaneous tissue to achieve long-lasting effects. They are used in areas like the cheeks, lips, chin, and jawline for augmentation and contouring. A denser formulation like elasty f plus is well-suited for volume restoration and facial definition, making elasty f plus a common choice for targeted enhancement.

How to Decide Between the Two

Choosing between biorevitalization and fillers depends on the aesthetic goals:

Those seeking hydration, radiance, and overall skin improvement may benefit more from biorevitalization Patients with concerns such as volume loss or deep static wrinkles typically require dermal fillers A combination approach is often used for comprehensive rejuvenation, enhancing both structure and skin quality Treatment choice should also consider age, skin condition, and prior procedures

By targeting different layers and mechanisms, both treatments can complement each other effectively.

Results and Maintenance

Biorevitalization offers cumulative benefits with each session, and results tend to build gradually. Maintenance treatments are recommended every few months, depending on skin condition and response.

Fillers generally provide more immediate and longer-lasting outcomes, with some products maintaining their effect for up to 12 months or more. Periodic touch-ups help sustain results while accommodating ongoing changes in facial anatomy.

Conclusion

Both biorevitalization and fillers play essential roles in non-surgical facial rejuvenation. While one focuses on hydration, smoothness, and elasticity, the other provides volume, contour, and wrinkle correction. Products like elasty f plus exemplify how targeted volume augmentation can be achieved alongside broader skin treatment strategies.

When carefully selected and administered, these techniques offer safe, effective, and customizable pathways to healthier, younger-looking skin.